Sep 02 2008
Sarah Palin=Hypocrite
Sarah Palin the dark-horse that surprised us all is not so squeaky clean as John McCain portraits her. She is no better than anybody in Washington D.C right now. Mrs. Palin’s talk of battling big oil, corruption and wasteful federal spending is only a half-truth. She used the “good ole’ boy” network to receive earmarks for her small town of Wasilla. Where is that you ask? It is a small town in Alaska with an estimated population of 6,000 people. During her time as mayor of Wasilla she collected a total of $27 million dollars in earmarks from the federal government. Why does a town of 6,000 need that much money in earmarks from the Feds? Talk about wasteful spending! Apparently she used the money to build a youth center, which came out to be $500,00 and to fix sewer lines which had a $900,000 price tag. The big expenditure was a $15 million dollar rail line that connected her town with the town of infamous Alaska senator Ted Stevens. That’s a coincidence right? I don’t think so! She hired a law firm that had connections with Stevens and other top Republican movers and shakers. As she developed these connections the money started to roll into her town. She has been receiving earmarks as early as 2000!
It was only when she saw that these people were a liablity to her, is when she turned into a “crusader”who fights against corruption and wasteful government spending. So if she was part of this wasteful spending how can she be the one that is going to remedy the pork-barrel spending in Washington? She needs to get off her high horse because she is just as guilty as every other politician Sarah Palin go back to the minors because your not ready for the big league…
She also kills polar bears.
good stuff, why is the news avoiding this kind of stuff????, geez it’s like they want her to be the next Vice President!
Can you tell me the source you got this information from? sounds pretty credible.
This is absolutely HUGE but is not even talked about by the msm. She acts one way and talks another. Put her picture next to hypocrite in the dictionary.
The Republicans have the news media afraid to go after Ms. Palin–they would be accused as being part of the liberal bias. Hopefully MSNBC will show some balls.
If you wanna play the hypocite card try not to be so biased when reporting info. If you want we can shine the spotlight back on Barack Obama, since he loves being in the spotlight so much. Obama…Change we can believe in. I can’t believe in Obama to bring change to Washington. He can’t even decide whether to vote yes or no. Go to http://obama.senate.gov/votes/ and see how he has voted….or actually not voted on the issues. That’s the kind of change I want. Hypocrite…Obama claims Palin lacks experience to fill the highest executive office, shall John McCain vacate the presidency early. Well, lets contrast their experience. Palin, mayor, executive experience. Obama community organizer, huh? Palin, govenor, 2 more years executive experience. Obama, first term senator, 2 years serving, 2 years running for president, still no executive experience. So, who really is more qualified to fill the highest executive office in the United States. Experience is on the side of Palin.
Nice try trying to change the subject again my liberal compadre, and way to follow the liberal media again and try to paint the picture that John McCain is running for a third Bush term. No, having executive experience is not a pre-condition to becoming president, but my point was, isn’t Barack Obama being hypocitical? He was quite critical of Sarah Palin’s experience and said she doesn’t have the experience needed to be Vice President, or President shall John McCain have to vacate the office. Now my arguement was that Sarah Palin has more experience than Barack Obama. So I feel comfortable voting for somebody with experience rather than aspirations. Guliani and Romney were running for president, and durring the primaries McCain ran against them, not with them. He argued against their ideas on how to run the presidency so why would he want them to be his vice president? He easily could have chosen one of them, but that’s exactly what the Democrats wanted him to do so they could expliot their idea of more of the same. But Palin compliments what McCain wants to accomplish. Reform. They want to bring accountability to Washington. Was there a more qualified person to be John McCain’s running mate? That’s simple, NO! Not if John McCain wanted to win the election and not give it away to the Democrats.
I saw her deceitfulness the day McCain introduced her. No one is all that perky, cheery, peppy, perfect and with no flaws. She only runs a state which is not as populated as the city of Chicago. She does not do it all on her own-she has help. She has absolutely no experience with foreign policy, Barack can speak effectively and diplomaticly with foreign leaders as he has shown. It is truly an insult to assume that all women will vote for her just because women followed Hillary. Palin needs to go back to Alaska and be a mother so her other daughters won’t succumb to being unwed mothers. All you have to do is research this woman, she is dirty-Anchorage newspaper online archives has alot of her dirt she has done.
Studly, you want to stay focused on hypocrites? Look in the mirror. Nice how you cite Obama’s lack of voting for the past few months as a character flaw…did you happen to notice that the dates when he was “not voting” were recent, as in, during the current presidential race? Did you bother to look at McCain’s record? No? I did: http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/m000303/votes/missed/
If you are going to criticize, at least know your material.
I foudn this on the net about Palin. She preaches equality but then goes on the attack with native people in Alaska
See here
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-80921
There’s a whole bunch of other things she says that fit the title hypocrite.
Well look what I found
http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-80921
Hmmm sounds like a hypocrite and a bigot
You said, “HOw she portaits herself. . .” It seems to me you mean, “How she portrays herself. . .”